年份：2014
導演兼編劇：Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu (阿利安卓崗札雷伊納利圖)
主演：Michael Keaton (米高基頓)、Emma Stone(艾瑪史東)、Naomi Watts(娜歐蜜華茲)、Zach Galifianakis
(查克葛里芬納奇)、Edward Norton(艾德華諾頓)
IMDB：8.2
Rottentomatos:92%
評價：☆☆☆☆☆
短評：
這部片我想Michael Keaton會得奧斯卡男主角、Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu會得導演或是最佳編劇吧，攝影也很有機會！我把這部片成功的地方稱作「偉大的運鏡」。為何我說是「偉大的運鏡」，因為它的拍攝手法十分的引人注目，採取移動式攝影，影像拼接的有內涵。這部Birdman可以說是典型美國電影，處處都帶有濃厚的紐約都市風味。而且部分拍攝都市建築與人物的運鏡角度，比如Riggan幻想自己飛翔的畫面等等，有些像是美國經典遊戲《Grand Theft Auto》的主角重生或是讀取成功的畫面。
After saw this film,I think that Michael Keation has a large chance to win the The Oscar for best actor and Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu would win best director or best playwright,even the best photography would.I call the "magnificent photography"to the best place of this film and why I say that on it,because it uses the attractive photographic skill to cause and lead our eyes to follow chacters in it.With the moving of photography and rich connotation of images composite,it isn't only a successful film,but also will be a classic one.It fulls of elements of the USA and expresses grumous flavor of the NY.Parts of photographic technique on buildings and chacters in this film,for example,Riggan fantasy that he fly like a birdman,has a common design like "Grand Theft Auto" which is a classic american video game,including the renascence of the role or loading successful in GTA.
第二優點是音效，本部片在進行的時候，都存在著鼓(可能是爵士鼓與鈸)的音效，這很重要，讓本來可能會有些乏味的劇情增色不少，對於Birdman這種美國黑色幽默電影來說，音效的設計擔綱著很重要的角色。而音效的設定也很有規劃，並非所有鏡頭都有音效，而是經過特定的安排。
Sound is the second advantage,drums(maybe Jazz ones)and gongs act the indespensable role and bring some lively energy to the plot orginally a litte borings.For this style of black humar,sound application play an important character.The set of sound is also thorough elaborative plan rather than abusing.
第三是劇本設計。本來Birdman所要傳述的是一位曾經紅極一時的演員面對新時代、新演員、新拍攝手法的恐懼與不安，乍看之下劇情有些單薄。但是，經過主角與其他配角的互動之後，我們可以看到更多的面向。如：Riggan、Mike與Lesley多次在劇院所飾演的相同橋段(床戲)，電影中出現了不下三次，乍聽起來像是肥皂劇的對白設計，但是我們卻看到台詞的背後，擁有演員本身對於人生的控訴與戲謔，甚至又是自己在演出自己的真實故事；如同Mike自己所說的「我在台上會有那麼好的演出，並不是因為很會演戲，而是理所當然的呈現自己」。鏡頭的游移更帶出了後台的混亂，反襯出台前的光鮮。也說明了一屆演員從低階劇團蛻變到Broadway的辛酸血淚。
Scenario is the third good thing.Orginally,"Birdman" expresses the horror,unrest and pressure on a role who has been popular in his past time but he needs to face the current of skills,in other words,to face a brandly new age of drama.To an extent,the scenario has a litte weak,but thorough the interaction of other roles,we are able to see more directions of it.For instance,Riggan,Mike and Lesley play the repeated sence of "bed"that content like sopa drama and appears not least for three times in whole film,but we could perceive the accusation and sarcasm behind the lines they act that even perform their real story.Just like Mike saying"The thing i have the best performance isn't rely on best playing skill,is behaving myself on stages."The move of camera brings the chaos at backstage to mirror the spotlight the front.The film testifies the ordeal of an actor that grows up from a low-level to Broadway.
黑色電影多具有內涵，而且大部分都會流露出很強烈的戲謔感，而要拍好一步黑色電影卻是難上加難。除了要有很好的編劇之外、好的選角、配樂與運鏡都是十分重要的。拍得好可以成為經典、拍的差的比比皆是。最有名的莫過於20年前由昆汀‧塔倫提諾(Quentin Tarantino)所執導的《Pulp Fiction》。我可以預言，這部《Birdman》在往後20年來看，也會是經典好片。
There are many connotations behind black films,and most of them would be easy to transmit the intense sense of sarcasm,but it is so difficult to direct well on a black film.Except a best scenarist,correct decision of choosing role,a matched sound and smart photography are all indispensable.If it is well- direction,a black film could be classic.The most famous black film I know that is "Pulp Fiction"directed by Quentin Tarantino 20 years ago.I can assert that this "Birdman"will be the classic 20 years later on.
(2015.2.9)
沒有留言:
張貼留言